+187.5%
NVT vs EOSE
+42.6%
+144.9%
-46.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EOSE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.6% | -1.0% | +5.6% | +4.7% |
| 7D | +4.1% | +1.8% | +2.3% | +3.9% |
| 30D | -5.1% | -6.8% | +1.7% | -4.9% |
| 3M | -1.2% | -36.3% | +35.1% | +1.9% |
| 6M | +46.6% | -38.8% | +85.3% | +49.7% |
| YTD | +60.0% | -65.5% | +125.5% | +68.4% |
| 1Y | +70.8% | -45.3% | +116.1% | +73.6% |
| 3Y | +187.5% | +44.2% | +143.4% | +159.2% |
| All | +187.5% | +42.6% | +144.9% | +159.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOSE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOSE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOSE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOSE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling