+70.9%
NVT vs EOSE
-49.1%
+119.9%
-27.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EOSE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +10.9% | -8.3% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +5.1% | +19.0% | -13.9% | +2.3% |
| 30D | -3.7% | +1.6% | -5.3% | -4.4% |
| 3M | -10.1% | -52.0% | +41.8% | -2.7% |
| 6M | +37.5% | -42.5% | +80.0% | +43.1% |
| YTD | +53.7% | -66.1% | +119.9% | +66.0% |
| 1Y | +70.9% | -47.1% | +118.0% | +88.2% |
| All | +70.9% | -49.1% | +119.9% | +88.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOSE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOSE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOSE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOSE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling