+180.7%
NVT vs DPZ
-12.8%
+193.6%
-46.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DPZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -4.2% | +1.7% | -2.1% |
| 7D | +7.0% | -7.3% | +14.3% | +7.8% |
| 30D | -2.3% | -7.6% | +5.3% | -1.6% |
| 3M | -3.1% | +1.8% | -4.9% | -4.0% |
| 6M | +47.0% | -21.8% | +68.8% | +54.6% |
| YTD | +56.2% | -22.0% | +78.2% | +64.0% |
| 1Y | +74.5% | -28.6% | +103.2% | +88.5% |
| All | +180.7% | -12.8% | +193.6% | +175.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DPZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DPZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DPZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DPZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling