+190.3%
NVT vs DECK
-3.0%
+193.3%
-46.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +1.6% | +1.0% | +2.2% |
| 7D | +5.1% | -2.2% | +7.3% | +5.6% |
| 30D | -3.7% | -13.6% | +9.9% | -0.6% |
| 3M | -10.1% | -21.2% | +11.1% | -5.7% |
| 6M | +37.5% | -21.1% | +58.5% | +43.7% |
| YTD | +53.7% | -17.2% | +71.0% | +57.4% |
| 1Y | +70.9% | -30.7% | +101.6% | +83.1% |
| All | +190.3% | -3.0% | +193.3% | +214.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling