+88.9%
NVS vs ACM
-9.6%
+98.5%
-20.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.2% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -1.0% | +5.1% | -6.1% | -1.5% |
| 30D | +12.5% | +18.7% | -6.1% | +10.9% |
| 3M | +5.2% | +15.5% | -10.3% | +3.8% |
| 6M | +8.2% | +1.2% | +7.0% | +7.7% |
| YTD | +19.8% | -25.2% | +45.0% | +22.0% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | -46.3% | +71.1% | +31.6% |
| All | +88.9% | -9.6% | +98.5% | +87.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling