-55.7%
NVO vs PLTD
-77.2%
+21.5%
-65.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | +0.4% | -1.7% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -4.7% | -0.9% | -3.8% | -4.7% |
| 30D | -5.4% | +1.3% | -6.8% | -5.3% |
| 3M | +7.0% | -32.9% | +39.8% | +5.2% |
| 6M | +17.6% | -24.9% | +42.5% | +17.4% |
| YTD | -8.0% | -18.2% | +10.2% | -7.8% |
| 1Y | -13.8% | -28.7% | +14.9% | -13.9% |
| All | -55.7% | -77.2% | +21.5% | -55.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling