-52.9%
NVO vs MXL
+222.8%
-275.7%
-74.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MXL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | +7.5% | -9.7% | -2.5% |
| 7D | -7.6% | +18.9% | -26.4% | -8.5% |
| 30D | -6.0% | +0.3% | -6.3% | -6.2% |
| 3M | -0.8% | -8.0% | +7.3% | -2.2% |
| 6M | +16.5% | +341.2% | -324.8% | -1.9% |
| YTD | -11.1% | +327.8% | -338.9% | -25.0% |
| 1Y | -16.7% | +364.9% | -381.6% | -30.4% |
| 3Y | -52.9% | +229.2% | -282.1% | -60.9% |
| All | -52.9% | +222.8% | -275.7% | -60.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MXL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MXL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MXL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MXL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling