-13.8%
NVO vs LSCC
+74.7%
-88.5%
-43.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.3% | -1.7% | +0.4% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -4.7% | +1.4% | -6.1% | -4.8% |
| 30D | -5.4% | -10.0% | +4.6% | -4.9% |
| 3M | +7.0% | -16.1% | +23.0% | +7.3% |
| 6M | +17.6% | +27.4% | -9.8% | +7.4% |
| YTD | -8.0% | +56.9% | -65.0% | -21.2% |
| 1Y | -13.8% | +74.6% | -88.4% | -29.5% |
| All | -13.8% | +74.7% | -88.5% | -29.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling