-16.7%
NVO vs LCID
-78.4%
+61.6%
-43.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | +1.0% | -3.1% | -2.2% |
| 7D | -7.6% | -9.8% | +2.3% | -6.5% |
| 30D | -6.0% | -35.5% | +29.5% | -1.4% |
| 3M | -0.8% | -18.4% | +17.6% | -0.7% |
| 6M | +16.5% | -60.5% | +76.9% | +29.2% |
| YTD | -11.1% | -60.1% | +49.0% | -2.1% |
| 1Y | -16.7% | -78.8% | +62.1% | +1.9% |
| All | -16.7% | -78.4% | +61.6% | +1.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling