-52.9%
NVO vs HUBB
+46.2%
-99.1%
-74.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HUBB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | +1.8% | -3.9% | -2.5% |
| 7D | -7.6% | -0.1% | -7.5% | -7.6% |
| 30D | -6.0% | -10.0% | +4.0% | -4.0% |
| 3M | -0.8% | -1.6% | +0.8% | -1.4% |
| 6M | +16.5% | -3.1% | +19.5% | +14.8% |
| YTD | -11.1% | +4.6% | -15.7% | -14.1% |
| 1Y | -16.7% | +3.3% | -20.1% | -19.4% |
| 3Y | -52.9% | +46.6% | -99.5% | -58.2% |
| All | -52.9% | +46.2% | -99.1% | -58.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HUBB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HUBB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HUBB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HUBB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling