-51.9%
NVO vs GRMN
+179.1%
-231.0%
-74.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | 0.0% | -1.2% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -7.4% | -1.8% | -5.6% | -7.0% |
| 30D | -5.5% | -12.1% | +6.6% | -3.0% |
| 3M | +4.1% | +18.0% | -13.9% | +0.2% |
| 6M | +19.3% | +13.7% | +5.6% | +15.4% |
| YTD | -9.2% | +35.3% | -44.5% | -15.6% |
| 1Y | -15.0% | +17.2% | -32.3% | -18.8% |
| All | -51.9% | +179.1% | -231.0% | -59.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling