-52.9%
NVO vs BIIB
-16.5%
-36.4%
-74.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | +0.8% | -2.9% | -2.4% |
| 7D | -7.6% | -1.7% | -5.9% | -7.1% |
| 30D | -6.0% | +4.0% | -9.9% | -7.1% |
| 3M | -0.8% | +8.6% | -9.4% | -3.6% |
| 6M | +16.5% | +14.0% | +2.5% | +10.9% |
| YTD | -11.1% | +23.4% | -34.5% | -18.1% |
| 1Y | -16.7% | +45.9% | -62.6% | -28.3% |
| 3Y | -52.9% | -16.1% | -36.8% | -56.4% |
| All | -52.9% | -16.5% | -36.4% | -56.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling