-52.9%
NVO vs BHP
+71.6%
-124.5%
-74.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BHP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | -0.2% | -1.9% | -2.1% |
| 7D | -7.6% | -3.6% | -4.0% | -6.8% |
| 30D | -6.0% | -1.2% | -4.8% | -5.7% |
| 3M | -0.8% | +1.2% | -2.0% | -1.4% |
| 6M | +16.5% | +21.4% | -5.0% | +9.4% |
| YTD | -11.1% | +50.4% | -61.5% | -22.7% |
| 1Y | -16.7% | +67.5% | -84.2% | -30.3% |
| 3Y | -52.9% | +72.8% | -125.7% | -63.0% |
| All | -52.9% | +71.6% | -124.5% | -63.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BHP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BHP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BHP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BHP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling