+906.1%
NVDX vs EPAM
-50.6%
+956.7%
-68.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.4% | -2.4% | +3.8% | +2.1% |
| 7D | +11.6% | +2.0% | +9.7% | +11.0% |
| 30D | +7.5% | +6.5% | +1.0% | +5.1% |
| 3M | +2.1% | +19.9% | -17.8% | -4.7% |
| 6M | +35.5% | -16.9% | +52.5% | +45.0% |
| YTD | +24.1% | -42.9% | +67.0% | +54.1% |
| 1Y | +33.0% | -30.4% | +63.3% | +48.3% |
| All | +906.1% | -50.6% | +956.7% | +1,093.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling