+51.6%
NVDL vs PLTD
-77.2%
+128.9%
-66.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +0.4% | -2.2% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -0.9% | +0.1% | -1.1% |
| 30D | +3.4% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +4.8% |
| 3M | +8.1% | -32.9% | +41.0% | -11.9% |
| 6M | +31.9% | -24.9% | +56.8% | +20.9% |
| YTD | +21.1% | -18.2% | +39.4% | +21.1% |
| 1Y | +34.0% | -28.7% | +62.7% | +27.1% |
| All | +51.6% | -77.2% | +128.9% | -35.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling