+2,490.2%
NVDL vs LNT
+33.4%
+2,456.8%
-67.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | 0.0% | -0.2% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -10.3% | -1.0% | -9.3% | -11.0% |
| 30D | -7.1% | -4.2% | -2.9% | -9.9% |
| 3M | +6.6% | -6.7% | +13.3% | +1.5% |
| 6M | +21.1% | -3.6% | +24.6% | +19.1% |
| YTD | +15.2% | +5.9% | +9.3% | +21.8% |
| 1Y | +18.8% | +7.3% | +11.5% | +27.3% |
| 3Y | +649.9% | +46.5% | +603.4% | +956.1% |
| All | +2,490.2% | +33.4% | +2,456.8% | +3,851.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling