+1,323.1%
NVDL vs LII
+33.6%
+1,289.5%
-67.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.0% | -0.8% | -8.2% | -8.5% |
| 7D | -17.5% | -0.2% | -17.3% | -17.5% |
| 30D | -49.2% | -0.6% | -48.6% | -49.7% |
| 3M | -49.0% | -17.0% | -32.0% | -42.9% |
| 6M | -50.9% | -31.1% | -19.8% | -38.9% |
| YTD | -36.7% | -27.7% | -9.0% | -27.2% |
| 1Y | -43.0% | -26.2% | -16.8% | -36.2% |
| 3Y | +281.1% | -9.6% | +290.7% | +260.2% |
| All | +1,323.1% | +33.6% | +1,289.5% | +815.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling