+2,788.3%
NVDL vs GLDM
+143.0%
+2,645.2%
-67.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -0.9% | +2.5% | +2.0% |
| 7D | +11.7% | -0.5% | +12.2% | +11.9% |
| 30D | +7.8% | +4.4% | +3.4% | +6.3% |
| 3M | +3.3% | -1.1% | +4.4% | +3.7% |
| 6M | +38.9% | -13.7% | +52.6% | +42.9% |
| YTD | +28.5% | +2.8% | +25.7% | +30.3% |
| 1Y | +40.6% | +24.8% | +15.8% | +40.2% |
| 3Y | +648.7% | +127.8% | +520.9% | +609.6% |
| All | +2,788.3% | +143.0% | +2,645.2% | +2,237.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling