+2,490.2%
NVDL vs FLNC
-47.8%
+2,537.9%
-67.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +2.5% | -2.7% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -10.3% | -4.1% | -6.3% | -9.6% |
| 30D | -7.1% | -24.8% | +17.7% | -0.8% |
| 3M | +6.6% | -59.1% | +65.7% | +29.6% |
| 6M | +21.1% | -42.0% | +63.0% | +30.8% |
| YTD | +15.2% | -49.8% | +65.0% | +24.9% |
| 1Y | +18.8% | +43.1% | -24.3% | -4.7% |
| 3Y | +649.9% | -61.0% | +710.9% | +571.4% |
| All | +2,490.2% | -47.8% | +2,537.9% | +2,029.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling