+2,788.3%
NVDL vs AMC
-95.9%
+2,884.2%
-67.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +4.3% | -2.7% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +11.7% | +2.3% | +9.4% | +11.4% |
| 30D | +7.8% | -0.7% | +8.6% | +7.9% |
| 3M | +3.3% | +35.2% | -31.9% | -0.6% |
| 6M | +38.9% | +124.6% | -85.7% | +27.6% |
| YTD | +28.5% | +69.9% | -41.4% | +20.4% |
| 1Y | +40.6% | -2.6% | +43.2% | +37.1% |
| 3Y | +648.7% | -79.8% | +728.5% | +655.5% |
| All | +2,788.3% | -95.9% | +2,884.2% | +2,700.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling