+2,494.8%
NVDL vs AMC
-96.4%
+2,591.1%
-67.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.7% | -4.1% | -0.6% | -4.3% |
| 7D | -8.7% | -7.1% | -1.6% | -8.0% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -1.7% | +0.4% | -1.1% |
| 3M | +11.4% | +13.5% | -2.1% | +8.9% |
| 6M | +22.9% | +112.6% | -89.7% | +13.7% |
| YTD | +15.4% | +51.3% | -35.9% | +9.3% |
| 1Y | +18.8% | -14.5% | +33.2% | +17.2% |
| 3Y | +641.4% | -67.1% | +708.5% | +650.6% |
| All | +2,494.8% | -96.4% | +2,591.1% | +2,443.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling