+2,788.3%
NVDL vs ACGL
+70.0%
+2,718.2%
-67.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -1.7% | +3.4% | +1.4% |
| 7D | +11.7% | -0.7% | +12.4% | +11.6% |
| 30D | +7.8% | -1.0% | +8.8% | +7.8% |
| 3M | +3.3% | +11.0% | -7.7% | +3.7% |
| 6M | +38.9% | -0.3% | +39.2% | +39.6% |
| YTD | +28.5% | +2.3% | +26.2% | +28.8% |
| 1Y | +40.6% | +6.4% | +34.2% | +40.5% |
| 3Y | +648.7% | +34.0% | +614.7% | +565.9% |
| All | +2,788.3% | +70.0% | +2,718.2% | +2,281.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling