+384.2%
NVDA vs LMT
+36.0%
+348.2%
-36.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LMT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | +1.1% | -3.5% | -2.2% |
| 7D | -4.4% | -0.5% | -3.9% | -4.5% |
| 30D | +0.4% | -10.8% | +11.2% | -1.3% |
| 3M | +9.0% | +1.6% | +7.4% | +9.7% |
| 6M | +18.3% | -17.6% | +35.9% | +15.3% |
| YTD | +17.2% | +11.6% | +5.6% | +21.8% |
| 1Y | +23.3% | +17.2% | +6.1% | +29.9% |
| All | +384.2% | +36.0% | +348.2% | +460.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LMT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LMT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LMT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LMT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling