+309.2%
NVDA vs HTZ
-82.6%
+391.7%
-36.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.8% | -8.4% | +11.2% | +2.8% |
| 7D | -8.8% | -14.6% | +5.8% | -8.6% |
| 30D | -21.4% | -20.8% | -0.6% | -21.2% |
| 3M | -14.7% | -18.8% | +4.1% | -14.4% |
| 6M | -10.0% | -74.7% | +64.7% | -10.1% |
| YTD | +0.3% | -68.1% | +68.4% | +0.5% |
| 1Y | -0.5% | -73.5% | +73.0% | -0.6% |
| 3Y | +309.2% | -81.8% | +391.0% | +303.6% |
| All | +309.2% | -82.6% | +391.7% | +303.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling