+396.0%
NVDA vs COST
+69.9%
+326.1%
-36.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | COST | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -0.8% | -0.1% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -2.8% | +2.5% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +2.8% | -5.3% | +8.1% | +4.6% |
| 3M | +7.4% | -6.7% | +14.1% | +9.6% |
| 6M | +22.6% | -9.9% | +32.6% | +26.5% |
| YTD | +20.1% | +5.1% | +14.9% | +12.2% |
| 1Y | +31.2% | -7.3% | +38.4% | +32.5% |
| All | +396.0% | +69.9% | +326.1% | +203.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside COST.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus COST return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × COST return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded COST wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling