-86.0%
NVD vs PLTD
-77.8%
-8.2%
-90.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +4.6% | -6.0% | -4.1% |
| 7D | -11.1% | +5.9% | -17.0% | -14.7% |
| 30D | -13.3% | -11.6% | -1.6% | -7.5% |
| 3M | -19.8% | -29.9% | +10.1% | -8.6% |
| 6M | -48.8% | -28.5% | -20.3% | -44.2% |
| YTD | -49.7% | -20.4% | -29.3% | -51.0% |
| 1Y | -61.4% | -33.3% | -28.1% | -56.6% |
| All | -86.0% | -77.8% | -8.2% | -54.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling