-99.2%
NVD vs NIO
-66.3%
-32.9%
-99.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -1.6% | +0.2% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -11.1% | -13.0% | +1.9% | -13.7% |
| 30D | -13.3% | -18.3% | +5.0% | -16.7% |
| 3M | -19.8% | -33.2% | +13.4% | -26.0% |
| 6M | -48.8% | -21.5% | -27.3% | -50.4% |
| YTD | -49.7% | -25.5% | -24.2% | -51.3% |
| 1Y | -61.4% | -38.0% | -23.4% | -63.4% |
| 3Y | -99.1% | -65.5% | -33.7% | -99.1% |
| All | -99.2% | -66.3% | -32.9% | -99.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling