-99.2%
NVD vs LCID
-92.5%
-6.7%
-99.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +1.7% | -3.1% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -11.1% | -6.6% | -4.5% | -11.8% |
| 30D | -13.3% | -30.1% | +16.9% | -16.7% |
| 3M | -19.8% | -17.6% | -2.2% | -19.8% |
| 6M | -48.8% | -54.4% | +5.6% | -53.1% |
| YTD | -49.7% | -55.7% | +6.1% | -53.4% |
| 1Y | -61.4% | -71.0% | +9.7% | -66.1% |
| 3Y | -99.1% | -92.6% | -6.5% | -99.4% |
| All | -99.2% | -92.5% | -6.7% | -99.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling