-99.1%
NVD vs FLNC
-56.4%
-42.7%
-99.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | +2.5% | -2.2% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +10.8% | -4.1% | +14.9% | +9.9% |
| 30D | +0.8% | -24.8% | +25.5% | -5.0% |
| 3M | -20.8% | -59.1% | +38.3% | -33.5% |
| 6M | -41.2% | -42.0% | +0.8% | -42.2% |
| YTD | -44.2% | -49.8% | +5.6% | -44.9% |
| 1Y | -54.2% | +43.1% | -97.2% | -38.1% |
| 3Y | -99.1% | -61.0% | -38.2% | -98.9% |
| All | -99.1% | -56.4% | -42.7% | -98.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling