-99.2%
NVD vs CCEP
+85.9%
-185.1%
-99.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | CCEP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | -3.1% | +1.7% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -11.1% | -3.1% | -8.0% | -10.7% |
| 30D | -13.3% | -2.6% | -10.7% | -12.9% |
| 3M | -19.8% | +14.9% | -34.8% | -20.3% |
| 6M | -48.8% | +2.3% | -51.0% | -48.9% |
| YTD | -49.7% | +17.8% | -67.5% | -50.1% |
| 1Y | -61.4% | +24.2% | -85.6% | -61.6% |
| 3Y | -99.1% | +84.7% | -183.9% | -99.0% |
| All | -99.2% | +85.9% | -185.1% | -99.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CCEP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CCEP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CCEP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CCEP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling