-99.2%
NVD vs BLDR
-53.1%
-46.1%
-99.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | -4.9% | +8.8% | +2.0% |
| 7D | -7.7% | -0.3% | -7.3% | -7.6% |
| 30D | -5.8% | -16.2% | +10.4% | -11.9% |
| 3M | -23.2% | -14.4% | -8.8% | -26.2% |
| 6M | -49.7% | -32.8% | -16.9% | -55.0% |
| YTD | -47.7% | -39.2% | -8.5% | -54.5% |
| 1Y | -61.3% | -57.7% | -3.7% | -71.7% |
| 3Y | -99.2% | -55.3% | -43.9% | -99.2% |
| All | -99.2% | -53.1% | -46.1% | -99.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling