-98.5%
NVD vs ARMK
+102.8%
-201.4%
-99.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | +0.1% | +3.8% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +28.6% | +2.7% | +26.0% | +30.9% |
| 30D | +73.6% | -1.5% | +75.1% | +74.3% |
| 3M | +70.1% | -11.6% | +81.6% | +58.1% |
| 6M | +53.6% | +6.7% | +46.8% | +65.0% |
| YTD | -7.0% | +47.4% | -54.4% | +30.7% |
| 1Y | -9.0% | +41.5% | -50.5% | +23.1% |
| 3Y | -98.3% | +95.5% | -193.9% | -96.8% |
| All | -98.5% | +102.8% | -201.4% | -97.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling