+65.0%
NUE vs STZ
-49.9%
+114.9%
-47.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | STZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | +0.5% | +0.1% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -2.3% | -6.0% | +3.7% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -6.1% | -8.9% | +2.8% | -4.9% |
| 3M | +1.7% | -12.6% | +14.2% | +3.6% |
| 6M | +53.1% | -17.2% | +70.3% | +56.8% |
| YTD | +59.0% | -10.0% | +69.1% | +60.2% |
| 1Y | +85.3% | -14.3% | +99.6% | +88.1% |
| All | +65.0% | -49.9% | +114.9% | +77.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling