+154.5%
NUE vs FLNC
-70.4%
+224.8%
-47.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +2.5% | -0.9% | +1.4% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -4.1% | +3.4% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -4.6% | -24.8% | +20.2% | -2.7% |
| 3M | -0.3% | -59.1% | +58.8% | +5.7% |
| 6M | +51.9% | -42.0% | +93.8% | +53.7% |
| YTD | +60.0% | -49.8% | +109.8% | +61.9% |
| 1Y | +82.9% | +43.1% | +39.8% | +63.5% |
| 3Y | +66.0% | -61.0% | +126.9% | +54.3% |
| All | +154.5% | -70.4% | +224.8% | +116.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling