-16.9%
NU vs GLDM
-13.2%
-3.7%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.5% | -0.8% | +3.3% | +3.0% |
| 7D | +3.6% | +4.7% | -1.0% | +0.2% |
| 30D | -22.8% | -0.9% | -21.9% | -22.3% |
| 3M | -14.8% | -4.3% | -10.5% | -11.6% |
| 6M | -16.9% | -13.4% | -3.5% | -6.0% |
| All | -16.9% | -13.2% | -3.7% | -6.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling