+125.0%
NU vs EPAM
-54.6%
+179.7%
-39.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.0% | -2.4% | +0.4% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +7.5% | +2.0% | +5.5% | +7.1% |
| 30D | +6.1% | +6.5% | -0.4% | +4.4% |
| 3M | +26.8% | +19.9% | +6.9% | +20.7% |
| 6M | +2.5% | -16.9% | +19.4% | +6.0% |
| YTD | -8.2% | -42.9% | +34.7% | +3.3% |
| 1Y | +3.4% | -30.4% | +33.7% | +9.4% |
| All | +125.0% | -54.6% | +179.7% | +170.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling