+98.1%
NU vs CLSK
+211.4%
-113.3%
-39.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLSK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | +6.8% | -9.5% | -3.6% |
| 7D | -4.9% | +7.7% | -12.6% | -5.9% |
| 30D | +7.8% | +12.2% | -4.4% | +5.8% |
| 3M | +20.9% | -15.5% | +36.4% | +22.1% |
| 6M | +0.9% | +39.3% | -38.5% | -4.9% |
| YTD | -12.7% | +35.1% | -47.7% | -18.2% |
| 1Y | -6.4% | +34.0% | -40.4% | -13.9% |
| 3Y | +98.1% | +226.3% | -128.2% | +62.0% |
| All | +98.1% | +211.4% | -113.3% | +62.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLSK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLSK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLSK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLSK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling