+103.5%
NU vs BIIB
-17.2%
+120.7%
-39.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +2.2% | -2.1% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -4.2% | -4.0% | -0.2% | -3.8% |
| 30D | +10.0% | +5.7% | +4.4% | +9.5% |
| 3M | +29.3% | +10.9% | +18.4% | +27.6% |
| 6M | +0.9% | +14.3% | -13.4% | -0.9% |
| YTD | -10.3% | +22.4% | -32.7% | -12.9% |
| 1Y | -3.2% | +51.1% | -54.2% | -9.2% |
| All | +103.5% | -17.2% | +120.7% | +105.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling