+41.5%
NU vs BBIO
+81.7%
-40.2%
-72.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | -0.1% | -2.6% | -2.6% |
| 7D | -4.9% | -3.2% | -1.7% | -4.3% |
| 30D | +7.8% | -13.6% | +21.4% | +10.7% |
| 3M | +20.9% | +7.2% | +13.7% | +18.8% |
| 6M | +0.9% | +1.5% | -0.6% | +0.1% |
| YTD | -12.7% | -5.3% | -7.4% | -12.8% |
| 1Y | -6.4% | +37.7% | -44.1% | -13.4% |
| 3Y | +98.1% | +153.9% | -55.8% | +55.4% |
| All | +41.5% | +81.7% | -40.2% | -28.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling