+557.4%
NTRA vs NIO
-60.1%
+617.5%
-28.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -4.9% | +3.7% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +2.7% | -14.5% | +17.2% | +4.6% |
| 30D | -19.2% | -15.0% | -4.2% | -17.7% |
| 3M | +2.7% | -35.6% | +38.2% | +8.1% |
| 6M | +63.4% | -55.7% | +119.0% | +79.3% |
| YTD | +39.3% | -43.1% | +82.4% | +47.1% |
| 1Y | +59.0% | -53.5% | +112.5% | +72.1% |
| 3Y | +557.4% | -59.8% | +617.2% | +580.4% |
| All | +557.4% | -60.1% | +617.5% | +580.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling