+505.1%
NTRA vs LCID
-92.8%
+597.9%
-32.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | -7.8% | +9.7% | +2.8% |
| 7D | +1.6% | -9.3% | +10.9% | +2.6% |
| 30D | +3.8% | -35.4% | +39.2% | +8.6% |
| 3M | +48.2% | -17.1% | +65.3% | +48.3% |
| 6M | +61.0% | -58.9% | +119.9% | +74.1% |
| YTD | +44.2% | -59.6% | +103.8% | +55.4% |
| 1Y | +87.3% | -78.0% | +165.3% | +114.4% |
| All | +505.1% | -92.8% | +597.9% | +693.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling