+89.2%
NTRA vs FROG
+74.0%
+15.2%
-28.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | -1.7% | +2.5% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -0.5% | +0.7% | +0.3% |
| 30D | +4.1% | +1.3% | +2.8% | +3.7% |
| 3M | +50.0% | +11.1% | +39.0% | +48.1% |
| 6M | +67.3% | +108.3% | -41.0% | +51.5% |
| YTD | +43.6% | +39.6% | +4.0% | +35.0% |
| 1Y | +89.2% | +74.7% | +14.5% | +76.0% |
| All | +89.2% | +74.0% | +15.2% | +76.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling