+264.2%
NTRA vs AMDL
+95.0%
+169.1%
-28.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | AMDL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | +9.2% | -9.0% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +0.6% | +4.5% | -4.0% | +0.1% |
| 30D | +19.5% | -4.4% | +23.9% | +19.6% |
| 3M | +47.8% | -30.5% | +78.2% | +48.6% |
| 6M | +61.6% | +300.9% | -239.2% | +26.9% |
| YTD | +43.3% | +219.9% | -176.7% | +13.9% |
| 1Y | +97.0% | +374.7% | -277.7% | +42.4% |
| All | +264.2% | +95.0% | +169.1% | +149.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMDL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMDL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMDL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMDL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling