+89.2%
NTRA vs AIG
-1.2%
+90.4%
-28.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | AIG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | +0.4% | +0.5% | +1.0% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -1.2% | +1.4% | -0.1% |
| 30D | +4.1% | -1.1% | +5.2% | +3.8% |
| 3M | +50.0% | +0.7% | +49.4% | +50.1% |
| 6M | +67.3% | -2.2% | +69.5% | +65.5% |
| YTD | +43.6% | -10.8% | +54.4% | +39.8% |
| 1Y | +89.2% | -2.0% | +91.3% | +86.9% |
| All | +89.2% | -1.2% | +90.4% | +86.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AIG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AIG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AIG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AIG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling