+63.4%
NTRA vs ACGL
+17.2%
+46.2%
-28.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ACGL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +0.3% | -1.5% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +2.7% | +2.2% | +0.5% | +3.2% |
| 30D | -19.2% | +12.3% | -31.5% | -15.8% |
| 3M | +2.7% | +11.8% | -9.1% | +7.0% |
| 6M | +63.4% | +17.5% | +45.9% | +68.2% |
| All | +63.4% | +17.2% | +46.2% | +68.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACGL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACGL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACGL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACGL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling