+37.9%
NTR vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+137.9%
-28.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -7.1% | +6.7% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -5.4% | +4.1% | -1.3% |
| 30D | +16.8% | -24.8% | +41.6% | +16.9% |
| 3M | +20.7% | -62.8% | +83.5% | +20.5% |
| 6M | +0.5% | -99.5% | +100.1% | +0.6% |
| YTD | +29.2% | -99.8% | +128.9% | +29.2% |
| 1Y | +39.6% | -99.9% | +139.5% | +39.5% |
| 3Y | +37.9% | -100.0% | +137.9% | +34.2% |
| All | +37.9% | -100.0% | +137.9% | +34.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling