+41.8%
NTR vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+141.6%
-27.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -3.8% | +2.2% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +8.1% | -8.0% | +16.1% | +8.2% |
| 30D | +18.8% | -27.9% | +46.7% | +19.0% |
| 3M | +16.2% | -74.6% | +90.8% | +16.3% |
| 6M | +9.8% | -99.5% | +109.2% | +12.0% |
| YTD | +30.9% | -99.7% | +130.6% | +34.2% |
| 1Y | +41.8% | -99.9% | +141.6% | +44.4% |
| All | +41.8% | -99.9% | +141.6% | +44.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling