+74.1%
NTR vs UMAC
+473.8%
-399.7%
-27.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -2.5% | +2.1% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -3.4% | +2.1% | -1.2% |
| 30D | +16.8% | -15.1% | +31.9% | +17.0% |
| 3M | +20.7% | -10.8% | +31.5% | +20.5% |
| 6M | +0.5% | +15.7% | -15.1% | -0.9% |
| YTD | +29.2% | +80.1% | -51.0% | +26.1% |
| 1Y | +39.6% | +116.7% | -77.1% | +35.5% |
| All | +74.1% | +473.8% | -399.7% | +61.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling