+37.6%
NTR vs UMAC
+2.9%
+34.7%
-27.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | -10.9% | +14.8% | +4.4% |
| 7D | +4.3% | -26.0% | +30.4% | +5.5% |
| 30D | +2.6% | -40.3% | +42.9% | +4.7% |
| 3M | +8.5% | -51.1% | +59.7% | +11.2% |
| 6M | -3.3% | -5.6% | +2.3% | -7.3% |
| YTD | +19.6% | +2.3% | +17.3% | +13.8% |
| 1Y | +37.6% | +7.9% | +29.7% | +31.2% |
| All | +37.6% | +2.9% | +34.7% | +31.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling