+76.9%
NTR vs PLTU
+142.1%
-65.2%
-27.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -4.7% | +6.2% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -11.6% | +15.4% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +25.2% | -4.6% | +29.9% | +25.2% |
| 3M | +21.0% | +33.7% | -12.7% | +19.4% |
| 6M | +7.6% | -9.4% | +17.0% | +7.0% |
| YTD | +32.9% | -34.7% | +67.6% | +32.8% |
| 1Y | +43.1% | -23.2% | +66.3% | +41.5% |
| All | +76.9% | +142.1% | -65.2% | +60.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling